Git packfiles use delta compression, storing only the diff when a 10MB file changes by one line, while the objects table stores each version in full. A file modified 100 times takes about 1GB in Postgres versus maybe 50MB in a packfile. Postgres does TOAST and compress large values, but that’s compressing individual objects in isolation, not delta-compressing across versions the way packfiles do, so the storage overhead is real. A delta-compression layer that periodically repacks objects within Postgres, or offloads large blobs to S3 the way LFS does, is a natural next step. For most repositories it still won’t matter since the median repo is small and disk is cheap, and GitHub’s Spokes system made a similar trade-off years ago, storing three full uncompressed copies of every repository across data centres because redundancy and operational simplicity beat storage efficiency even at hundreds of exabytes.
Three microcode cycles for the writeback alone. That's acceptable because segment loads are already expensive multi-cycle operations, and the designers likely expected them to be infrequent -- most programs load their segments once at startup and never touch them again. Page translations happen on every memory access, so the same approach would be ruinous. Hence the fully autonomous hardware walker.，这一点在im钱包官方下载中也有详细论述
。同城约会对此有专业解读
I'm a ChatGPT power user: Here are 7 useful settings that are turned off by default，更多细节参见WPS官方版本下载
ВСУ запустили «Фламинго» вглубь России. В Москве заявили, что это британские ракеты с украинскими шильдиками16:45